<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Role Link Growth Plays in the SERPs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketinghub.info/the-role-link-growth-plays-in-the-serps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketinghub.info/the-role-link-growth-plays-in-the-serps/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing, sales marketing, search engine marketing and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:35:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dumitru Brinzan</title>
		<link>http://www.marketinghub.info/the-role-link-growth-plays-in-the-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Dumitru Brinzan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketinghub.info/the-role-link-growth-plays-in-the-serps/#comment-407</guid>
		<description>That does seem logical, but I doubt that is &quot;right&quot;.
For example, if I have a really really small niche website. And let&#039;s assume that there are just 500 websites on the web with the same niche.

Now, let&#039;s assume I get most of them to link to my site in the first ~6 months. After that, there are no more possible backlinks to my site. Does that mean that my SERPs should drop? I don&#039;t think so...

On a sidenote, I think links should gain strength as time passes. For example, if site A links to site B for over 3 months, or even a year, that means that site B is really a great resource. While if site A links to site B only for 1-2 months, that could trigger the &quot;paid link&quot; alert.

P.S. good article :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That does seem logical, but I doubt that is &#8220;right&#8221;.<br />
For example, if I have a really really small niche website. And let&#8217;s assume that there are just 500 websites on the web with the same niche.</p>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s assume I get most of them to link to my site in the first ~6 months. After that, there are no more possible backlinks to my site. Does that mean that my SERPs should drop? I don&#8217;t think so&#8230;</p>
<p>On a sidenote, I think links should gain strength as time passes. For example, if site A links to site B for over 3 months, or even a year, that means that site B is really a great resource. While if site A links to site B only for 1-2 months, that could trigger the &#8220;paid link&#8221; alert.</p>
<p>P.S. good article <img src='http://www.marketinghub.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
